The introverted Persians use the word shenâsi, ‘knowledge’ for what is called -logia, ‘discourse’ by the extroverted Greeks. The Persian equivalent for Iranology, discourse on Iran is for example Irân-shenâsi, Iran science, as that of psychology is ravân-shenâsi, or that of the closely related science of chiromancy is dast-shenâsi.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412ac/412ac5bc8d2286c38112815940359537b69a2ef8" alt=""
Nonclerics who wish to emphasize their piety without being mistaken for mullahs grow bushy round beards that are carefully trimmed and dyed, and often perfumed with rosewater. Mullahs who wish to portray themselves as “moderate” or open to a “dialogue of civilizations” choose beards that do not dominate their faces. A goatee is kept in deference to the Prophet, but it is extended by long sideburns to distinguish the wearer from the Saudis. A trim moustache is also added to show that one does not sympathize with Salafis like bin Laden.
Those who wish to hedge their bets – that is to say, advertise their Islamism while appearing “modern” – have opted for what is known in the West as designer stubble, achieved with an electric shaver that does not cut the facial hair from the root. This “modern” type of beard was authorized by Ayatollah Mahmoud Taleqani, one of the “useful idiots” that Marxists and fellow travelers promoted as a religious facade in the early days of the revolution. He ruled that Islam banned the use of razors that cut facial hair completely, but an electric shaver was acceptable because it allowed some of the hair to remain.
The Stalinists who collaborated with the mullahs in the first phases of the revolution distinguished themselves by maintaining two-day stubble dominated by a thick bushy moustache in memory of the Soviet despot. The Mujahedin Khalq (People’s Holy Warriors), Marxist-Islamist who helped Khomeini come to power but later broke with him, mark themselves out by shaving off their beards and growing signature moustaches in imitation of their Supreme Guide, Massoud Rajavi.
Because the regime attaches such importance to facial hair, its opponents use shaving as a sign of protest. Television news footage and photos of public gatherings published by newspapers are censored to make sure they do not show too many clean-shaven men. To further emphasize their individuality, young men grow their hair long or spiked, and wear T-shirts with Western inscriptions. A Western visitor would be surprised how many young Iranians wear T-shirts and caps that advertise various American baseball teams.”
(Amir Taheri: The Persian Night. Iran under the Khomeinist Revolution, Encounter Books, NY-London, 2009, 94-95.)
5 comentarios:
Good morning
I think that´s a very interesting text, but I have an answer, What about women? I know the veil is also a religious and politician sign of identity, but have they physical signs similar to the beard on the men?
Greetings and have a good weekend
Interesante pregunta la de Georgina.
Deriva en la cuestión de si se reconoce que exista sabiduría en la mujer (sabiduría, no piedad ni conocimiento religioso, por más que puedan ir juntos)
Obviamente la mujer, mucho más cubierta que el hombre, exprime su individualidad o su opción ideológica con su ropa (la rusari, mira por ejemplo aquí).
Sin embargo también así observé (en falta de semejante literatura sobre las mujeres puedo referirme solo a mis observaciones in situ) de cuanta individualidad pueden exprimir por ejemplo con el maquillaje o con el diseño de cejas. Quizá este último es tan expresivo y tan importante para las iranís como la barba para los hombres.
Recientemente he leído la carta de despedida “condicional” —muy conmovedora— de una chica que iba de ir a la manifestación de Teherán con un serio arriesgo de su vida, donde escribía que antes de ir allí, aún quería ir a hacer rediseñar sus cejas…
Amir Taheri is a fraud and charlatan who should not be believed.
Yes, now as I have completely read his book I also think so. I wrote this post when I was at the beginning of the book, and at that time it looked simply amusing, but now as I'm over it I think he is rather one-sided and propagandistic. I want to write more about this in a later post. I would be also grateful to you if you exposed why you think it so.
Publicar un comentario