And finally a last example from Yasnaya Polnaya, the former estate of Lev Tolstoy, where not only the base but the complete former statue was preserved and in fact only its head was changed: that of Stalin was replaced by that of Lenin. However, the coat attests well that it was tailored for the Generalissimus:
Switch over to our new blog! • ¡Pásese a nuestro nuevo blog!
The renewed version of our blog, with more features, a richer design, and available in nine languages, can be read here: https://wangriver.com
The new version also includes the old posts, often in expanded form. If you are curious about the updated version of this post, replace “riowang.blogspot.com/” in the URL with “riowang.studiolum.com/”, and the new link will most likely lead you there.
La versión renovada de nuestro blog, con más herramientas, un diseño más rico y disponible en nueve idiomas, se puede leer aquí: https://riowang.com
La nueva versión también incluye las publicaciones antiguas, a menudo en una forma ampliada. Si tiene curiosidad por la versión actualizada de esta entrada, sustituya «riowang.blogspot.com/» en la URL por «riowang.studiolum.com/es/», y el nuevo enlace probablemente le llevará allí.
Base and superstructure
And finally a last example from Yasnaya Polnaya, the former estate of Lev Tolstoy, where not only the base but the complete former statue was preserved and in fact only its head was changed: that of Stalin was replaced by that of Lenin. However, the coat attests well that it was tailored for the Generalissimus:
4 comentarios:
If I didn't fear being considered a refusenik, I'd say he stays however you put him.
:-)
I mean a monument to a person has several layers of representation, the person as a person, the person as a historical actor, the person as an icon for an ideology, the conscious self-representation and the unconscious representation of the society that created that monument with more or less stress on one of the three above interpretations of the person, just to mention five main ones. It happens very rarely that a discriminate person says yes to all these layers; but it is quite possible to say yes to some while refusing others: in other words, to establish an individual and dynamic relationship to that person as a person and as a historic actor, to that ideology and to that society. “Zilu said: The ruler of Wei awaits your taking on administration. What would be master’s priority? The Master replied: Certainly – rectifying names! If names are not rectified then language will not flow. If language does not flow, then affairs cannot be completed. If affairs are not completed, ritual and music will not flourish.”
But I was just kidding and noting how easily he could fit to any pre-existing base!
Personally, I say yes to everything that happened. It belongs to history, it cannot be changed, it should not be removed and, if possible, it should be remembered. These are also some of the reasons why I like your blog.
However, even if I was just kidding, since you gave me a detailed and generous response, for which I thank you, I find that in most cases a monument to a person, like any other piece of architecture commissioned by a state, from St. Peter's basilica to the Stasi building in Berlin, tends to be a rather conscious representation of power.
Rectifying names as first priority: how true.
There is always this amazing passage from Angelopoulous' film 'Ulysses Gaze'.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VF48LWXCjU&feature=related
Publicar un comentario